A lesson to learn

As some of you may have noticed, I usually do not comment immediately upon events and news. There are two main reasons for this, firstly I am very slow in updating my blog, secondly I believe that to have a detached view and analysis of what is going on, you need to have some time for reflection. This is even truer when you, yourself, have been involved in the story.

As you can read in some of my previous posts, I was one of the first academics to question and criticise the formerly media-acclaimed Policy Exchange’s report on extremist literature in British mosques and Islamic institutes authored by Dr MacEoin. This led to a couple of exchanges with the main researcher and author of the report, who often had a certain goliardic attitude towards legitimate methodological questions. Finally, what was at first an academic analysis and criticism of a flawed methodology, a dodgy research ethic, and a sensationalist (politically driven) report, ended in being shamed by the same mass media which used to praise it.

On the 13th of December, Newsnight’s journalist, Richard Watson, has shown during the Newsnight program, how the researchers involved in the collection of the material for the report faked and falsified the receipts, the same ones which Dr MacEoin guaranteed, in his comment on my blog, would have proven the ethical basis and trustworthiness of his report.

Dr MacEoin argued that my criticism of his flawed work and his possibly undercover, unethical, and forged research brought ‘nothing but shame’ on myself since my criticism was actually tacit approval of the material ‘discovered’ in the mosque. I suppose that now Dr MacEoin has to work hard to clean his name for shamefully using his academic title for a what appears to be nothing more than a scam. Of course, we can only judge from what we have, the report, Dr MacEoin’s comments, and Newsnight’s investigation.

To reach a final conclusion of the shameful story, we’d need a serious investigation, and to interview the researchers themselves. Yet what I am satisfied with is that the report, which was presented as a serious academic work, cannot be claimed as such. This is not research, this is not what we need. This is just ludicrous dilettantism, which unfortunately is spreading more and more.

There are some lessons that can be learnt from the Policy Exchange affair. Although peer-reviewing has its limits, and university research ethical committees are still too weak in their assessments, both are the only guarantee that a research can be reasonably trustworthy and eventual criticism will remain on analytical disagreements. I think that the mass media should be very careful when research and reports lack both these systems and are the products of institutes and associations with no real academic value.

The final lesson we have learnt is that the report did not tell us anything that we did not know before, but possibly has succeeded in alienating any possibility for serious research on the issue. A serious research would have asked: in which way is this material sold, by whom, for which reason, how is the material used by those who buy it, how is it different from those available on the Internet, which impact has it on those who read it, how is it perceived by the community, how is this literature part of a certain cultural tradition or linked to certain ethnic groups (if so), and many other questions.

Of course, the harm is already done, and even an anthropologist, who has the trust of the Muslim community, would refrain, after the damage that this report has done to respectable Islamic institutions and the wider Muslim community, to start such a research. Hence, I can only reaffirm that Policy Exchange hijacks professional research, because it wishes to hijack our minds with the atavic fear of the cruel Saladin.


5 thoughts on “A lesson to learn

Add yours

  1. Dennis MacEoin claims to be an expert on Middle East but what he is enthusiastic about can be judged by his following contributions. Writing to The Times in March 2007 he wrote:

    I could understand Muslims taking offence were it not for the fact that they are more than willing to give offence. Radical Islamic literature speaks openly of hating non-believers, describes Jews as the children of apes and pigs, describes women as of limited intellect and little worth, and calls music, singing, and other arts debased, corrupt, filthy, obscene and so on. If they are so willing to hand it out, they must learn to take it. Drawing Muhammad as a dog is not particularly witty, but it’s hardly a patch on what some Muslim ‘scholars’ say about things I and millions of others hold dear. When they curse freedom (it allows human beings to make their own laws instead of God’s laws) or democracy (the same), yet so many millions of Muslims have benefited from living in democracies that have given them refuge, I am deeply offended.

    It seems that the subsequent publications were to make the Muslims learn to “take it.”

    You may notice recent attempts to wipe one’s tracks off are all too visible
    (Though many retractions can still be recovered): http://tinyurl.com/2uk58s
    http://tinyurl.com/yu9wg5 and http://tinyurl.com/yuh96u

    MacEoin is the owner and principal contributor to “A Liberal Defence of Israel” which he introduces as: “A blog designed to correct the false impression that Israel is an illiberal, fascist, or apartheid state. Here, I shall present arguments to show that Israel actually embodies the best in democracy, anti-racism, religious freedom, and rights for women, gay people, and minorities of different kinds.” http://mid-eastplus.blogspot.com/

    Observers will find it amusing to see entries on the blog roll to detemine where MacEoin takes his inspirations from and whom he identifies and aligns with.

    Another blog to which MacEoin is associated is named as Middle East Analysis, Comment & Analysis about Middle East Affairs. The header blurb claims: Middle East Analysis presents a spectrum of views about Middle East political affairs. Opinions expressed in individual posts do not necessarily represent those of the group or of any other editor. http://middle-east-analysis.blogspot.com/

    See what topics, occasions and events MacEoin chooses to comment on:

    For the campaigns this ‘scholar’ is passionate about check:

    What kind of cards he has up in his sleeves can be guessed
    from his adulation of the below work as “simply riveting”

    MacEoin generated many flacks and triggered many questioning his stands and writings http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/archives/008296.php

    The above writings are clear and undeniable evidences of Denis’ obsession to demonize, distort and denounce a specific faith and its values. Attempts to portray MacEoin as a scholar tantamount to asking someone paint the followers of a particular faith in black, to tarnish their image and to taunt their traditions.

  2. There is a bit of a to-do on CiF –
    Much more than receipts
    Abdurahman Jafar
    Comment is Free
    17 Dec 2007

    A very good article with some excellent further comments by the author, and also Inayat Bunglawala, I believe.

    There are some comments here on the MediaLens.org messege board which people might find useful (Dr Marranci and Osama Saeed get a mention) –
    Evidence of extremism in mosques ‘fabricated’
    thread started 19 Dec 2007

    all the best everybody!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a website or blog at WordPress.com

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: